San Mateo County Logo
File #: 23-334    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Memo Status: Passed
File created: 4/25/2023 Departments: PLANNING AND BUILDING
On agenda: 5/23/2023 Final action: 5/23/2023
Title: Recommendation to: A) Open public hearing B) Close public hearing C) Deny the appeal and uphold the Planning Commission's decision to approve the Major Subdivision, PLN 2022-00136, by making the required findings and adopting the conditions of approval contained in Attachment A and determine that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15162.
Attachments: 1. 20230523_es_Executive Summary(Canyon Vista Partners, LLC.pdf, 2. 20230523_att_attachment a.pdf, 3. 20230523_att_attachment b.pdf, 4. 20230523_att_attachment c.pdf, 5. 20230523_att_attachment d.pdf, 6. 20230523_att_attachment e.pdf, 7. 20230523_att_attachment f.pdf, 8. 20230523_att_attachment g.pdf, 9. 20230523_att_attachment h.pdf, 10. 20230523_att_attachment i.pdf, 11. 20230523_att_attachment j.pdf, 12. Item No. 11 - Appeal ppt by Planning Dept.pdf
Special Notice / Hearing: 10-day notice; publication and 500 ft. radius __
Vote Required: Majority

To: Honorable Board of Supervisors
From: Steve Monowitz, Community Development
Subject: Consideration of an appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to approve a Major Subdivision to construct a new four-story, 23-unit condominium development at 206 Sequoia Avenue in the unincorporated Sequoia Tract area of San Mateo County.

County File Number: PLN 2022-00136 (Canyon Vista Partners, LLC.)

RECOMMENDATION:
title
Recommendation to:

A) Open public hearing

B) Close public hearing

C) Deny the appeal and uphold the Planning Commission's decision to approve the Major Subdivision, PLN 2022-00136, by making the required findings and adopting the conditions of approval contained in Attachment A and determine that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15162.

body
BACKGROUND:
The appellant contends that the Planning Commission's decision should be reversed and a decision hearing for the project be held again due to inadequate notification to all interested parties for the February 8, 2023 Planning Commission public meeting. See Attachment J for complete appeal documents.

Planning Commission Action

At its public hearing on February 8, 2023, the Planning Commission considered the Major Subdivision and heard testimony from members of the public in opposition of the project. The Planning Commission acknowledged that although the proposed four-story building is considerably large in bulk and height in comparison to the immediate neighborhood, the project complies with County and State regulations and will provide needed housing. The Planning Commission approved the Major Subdivision (5-0) on the basis that the proposed Major Subdivision complies with the County's General Plan, Inclusionary Ordinance, Subdivision Regulations, Zoning Regulations, and State D...

Click here for full text