San Mateo County Logo
File #: 18-1106    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Resolution Status: Passed
File created: 12/11/2017 Departments: ASSESSOR-COUNTY CLERK-RECORDER-ELECTIONS
On agenda: 12/11/2018 Final action: 12/11/2018
Title: Adopt a resolution authorizing an agreement with Sapient Corporation for the purpose of the design, development, implementation, and maintenance of the Assessor Property Assessment System (APAS), and for post-production maintenance and operations support in the maximum amount of $16,301,948 for the period of December 11, 2018 through December 31, 2031.
Attachments: 1. 20181211_r_ACRE APAS Sapient Contract, 2. 20181211_a_ACRE APAS Sapient Contract, 3. 20181211_att_Attachment 1- Contractor Disaster Recovery and Business Continuity Plan, 4. 20181211_att_Attachment 2a - Data Center Policy, 5. 20181211_att_Attachment 2b - E-mail-Policy, 6. 20181211_att_Attachment 2c - Internet Usage Policy, 7. 20181211_att_Attachment 2d - IT Security Policy, 8. 20181211_att_Attachment 2e - Vendor Contractor Policy, 9. 20181211_att_Attachment 2f - Virus Protection and Patch Management Policy, 10. 20181211_att_Attachment 3- IP Intellectual Property, 11. 20181211_att_Attachment 4 - Contractor Development Methodology_ValuePath, 12. 20181211_att_Attachment 5 - Deliverable Templates & Examples, 13. 20181211_att_Attachment 6 - Defined Terms, 14. 20181211_att_Attachment I - Rehabilitation Act 504, 15. 20181211_att_Exhibit A - Statement of Work #1, 16. 20181211_att_Exhibit A-1 Business Requirements, 17. 20181211_att_Exhibit A-2 Technical Requirements, 18. 20181211_att_Exhibit A-3 Deliverables, 19. 20181211_att_Exhibit A-4 Roles and Responsibilities Matrix, 20. 20181211_att_Exhibit A-5 Project Plan, 21. 20181211_att_Exhibit A-6 Financial Responsibility Matrix, 22. 20181211_att_Exhibit A-7 Change Control Procedures, 23. 20181211_att_Exhibit A-8 Risk Management Procedures, 24. 20181211_att_Exhibit A-9 Acceptance Criteria, 25. 20181211_att_Exhibit A-10 Warranty Services, 26. 20181211_att_Exhibit A-11 Maintenance and Operations Support Terms, 27. 20181211_att_Exhibit A-12 Approved Subcontractors, 28. 20181211_att_Exhibit A-13 Location of Services, 29. 20181211_att_Exhibit B - Fee Methodology and Payments (SOW #1), 30. 20181211_att_Exhibit B-1 Rate Card for additional services, 31. 20181211_att_Exhibit C - Statement of Work #2 10-Year Post Production M&O, 32. 20181211_att_Exhibit D - 10 Year Post Production Maintenance & Operation Support Payment (SOW #2), 33. 20181211_att_Template F - Assessor Functional and General Specifications, 34. 20181211_att_Template H - Technical Specifications Matrix
Special Notice / Hearing: None__
Vote Required: Majority

To: Honorable Board of Supervisors
From: Mark Church, Assessor-County Clerk-Recorder & Chief Elections Officer
Subject: Assessor-County Clerk-Recorder-Elections (ACRE) Assessor Property Assessment System (APAS) Project

RECOMMENDATION:
title
Adopt a resolution authorizing an agreement with Sapient Corporation for the purpose of the design, development, implementation, and maintenance of the Assessor Property Assessment System (APAS), and for post-production maintenance and operations support in the maximum amount of $16,301,948 for the period of December 11, 2018 through December 31, 2031.

body
BACKGROUND:
In February 2017, Assessor-County Clerk-Recorder-Elections (ACRE) released a Request for Proposals (RFP) ACRE 2017-0001 (Assessor Property Assessment System). The APAS project is a business-driven effort to replace the legacy system, modernize the county's property assessment tools, improve office workflows, and streamline internal/external interfaces to ACRE systems in order to meet the needs of constituents and stakeholders to maintain the statutory and constitutional obligations of San Mateo County. Therefore, this project is more than just a replacement of the existing legacy system - it represents a wholesale transformation of ACRE business processes.

DISCUSSION:
ACRE received four proposals in response to the RFP. One of the four proposals did not meet the minimum requirements outlined in the RFP and was disqualified.

An evaluation committee comprised of business and information technology members from the Assessor's division (along with representatives from Procurement and ISD) conducted an extensive evaluation process of the remaining three proposals. The evaluation process was divided into four stages.

Stage one included evaluation of the proposals by the evaluation committee without the cost element. Stage two consisted of a day-long onsite presentation by the prop...

Click here for full text