San Mateo County Logo
File #: 18-069    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Memo Status: Passed
File created: 1/2/2018 Departments: PLANNING AND BUILDING
On agenda: 1/23/2018 Final action: 1/23/2018
Title: Recommendation to authorize and direct the President of the Board of Supervisors to sign the attached comment letter regarding the Draft Environmental Impact Report prepared as part of Santa Clara County's review of Stanford's General Use Permit (GUP) Application.
Attachments: 1. 20180123_att_ Stanford GUP DEIR comments JDN Final Rev.pdf, 2. 20180123_att_Stanford Comment Letter.pdf
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.

Special Notice / Hearing:                         None__

      Vote Required:                         Majority

 

To:                      Honorable Board of Supervisors

From:                      Steve Monowitz, Community Development Director

Subject:                      Comment Letter on the Draft Environmental Impact Report Regarding Stanford’s General Use Permit Application

 

RECOMMENDATION:

title

Recommendation to authorize and direct the President of the Board of Supervisors to sign the attached comment letter regarding the Draft Environmental Impact Report prepared as part of Santa Clara County’s review of Stanford’s General Use Permit (GUP) Application.

body

BACKGROUND:

Stanford has submitted a General Use Permit (GUP) application to Santa Clara County that proposes the construction of up to 2.27 million square feet of new academic and academic support facilities, and 3,150 new on-campus housing units, between 2018 and 2035.  The development proposed under this GUP adds to the 10.25 million square feet of academic facilities and 15,237 housing units constructed under the prior General Use Permit.  Santa Clara County has prepared a Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as part of its review of this application for the new GUP.

 

DISCUSSION:

CEQA requires an analysis of a project’s impact on the environment in order to inform decision makers and the public of the potential consequences of the proposed development.  CEQA also requires an analysis of how to reduce a project’s environmental impacts to insignificant levels where feasible.  In this case, the project under review is located entirely within the unincorporated area of Santa Clara County.  Santa Clara County is therefore the Lead Agency and sole decision maker as to whether to approve the GUP and certify the EIR. 

 

Although the physical development proposed by Stanford is confined to its main campus, the environmental impacts of this development will occur over a much larger region, including in the unincorporated areas of San Mateo County.  The project’s impacts on circulation and housing in San Mateo County are of particular concern.  To ensure that these and other environmental impacts are adequately addressed by Santa Clara County, staff has prepared the attached comment letter, which incorporates comments submitted by San Mateo County residents.  Commenting on the DEIR, and participating in the public hearings conducted by Santa Clara County regarding the environmental review and GUP application, are the primary ways by which San Mateo County can influence Santa Clara County decisions on these important matters.      

 

FISCAL IMPACT:

Other than the staff resources needed to review and comment on the DEIR and GUP, the development proposed by Stanford will not have direct fiscal impacts on San Mateo County.  However, the project is likely to have significant indirect fiscal impacts, some of which are likely to benefit certain sectors of the local economy.  There are also likely to be significant negative fiscal impacts associated, for example, with increased traffic and housing costs, and the need to mitigate these impacts.  Stanford proposes, and the DEIR requires, that Stanford mitigate some of these impacts by paying into housing and traffic mitigation funds.  The adequacy of these proposed mitigations, and the methods by which these funds will be distributed to impacted jurisdictions, are of significant concern to San Mateo County, as detailed by the attached comment letter.   

 

ATTACHMENT:

A.                     Draft Comment Letter