San Mateo County Logo
File #: 16-139    Version: Name:
Type: Resolution Status: Passed
File created: 4/28/2017 Departments: COUNTY MANAGER
On agenda: 5/16/2017 Final action: 5/16/2017
Title: Adopt a resolution authorizing the President of the Board to execute an amendment to the Intergovernmental Agreement with the Airport Commission of the City and County of San Francisco relating to the reimbursement of services and the sharing of Hotel Transient Occupancy Tax.
Attachments: 1. 20170516_r_SFO Amendment, 2. 20170516_a_San Mateo Co Agreement
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.

Special Notice / Hearing:                         None__

      Vote Required:                         Majority

 

To:                      Honorable Board of Supervisors

From:                      John L. Maltbie, County Manager

Subject:                      Amendment to Intergovernmental Agreement with SFO Airport Commission

 

RECOMMENDATION:

title

Adopt a resolution authorizing the President of the Board to execute an amendment to the Intergovernmental Agreement with the Airport Commission of the City and County of San Francisco relating to the reimbursement of services and the sharing of Hotel Transient Occupancy Tax.

 

body

BACKGROUND:

In April 2016, this Board approved an intergovernmental agreement with the Airport Commission, on behalf of the City and County of San Francisco, with respect to two issues.  The first issue concerned SFO’s plan to build and operate a new 350- room hotel and the approval of a revenue sharing arrangement with the County for a portion of the new hotel’s Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) in its first five years of operation.  The second issue concerned SFO’s reimbursement to the San Mateo County Emergency Services Council Joint Powers Authority (JPA) for certain services provided by the JPA to the airport without SFO becoming a member of the JPA.  SFO has long held that they can’t become a JPA member for two reasons: one, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) requires that SFO only reimburse agencies for activities that happen on airport property and two, SFO cannot enter into a mutual aid agreement, as on-duty emergency personnel and vehicles at SFO are not permitted to leave airport property.

 

DISCUSSION:

While administering the quarterly billings to SFO for emergency response services, County staff realized that the basis for those billings, that being the definition of “Dispatch Calls”, included law enforcement and fire response calls. The County does not dispatch law enforcement or fire services to SFO, only emergency medical services.  The County and Airport staff met to discuss the definition and both parties agree that the definition should be revised to more accurately reflect the parties’ joint intentions regarding the Airport’s share of services.  As a result of those discussions, this amendment replaces the definition of “Dispatch Calls” with “CAD Incidents” (CAD - Computer Aided Dispatch), and excludes law enforcement and fire response calls, as well as cancelled calls. This change will have no effect on the amount of compensation the County expects to receive from SFO and all other provisions of the original agreement remain in full force and effect.

 

Adoption of this resolution contributes to the Shared Vision 2025 outcome of a Collaborative Community by partnering with the San Francisco International Airport on matters that will ultimately benefit the residents and visitors of San Mateo County, as well as the local economy.

 

County Counsel has reviewed the resolution and agreement as to form.

 

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no net County cost associated with this amendment.