Legislation Details

File #: 26-864    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Memo Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 10/2/2026 Departments: COUNTY ATTORNEY
On agenda: 10/20/2026 Final action:
Title: Report recommending the denial of claims (Non-culpable).
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.

Special Notice / Hearing:    None__

Vote Required:    Majority

 

To:                      Honorable Board of Supervisors

From:                      John D. Nibbelin, County Attorney                      

Subject:                      Disposition of Claims Filed Against County

 

RECOMMENDATION:

title

Report recommending the denial of claims (Non-culpable).

 

body

BACKGROUND:

Pursuant to section 2.10.070 of the Ordinance Code, the County Attorney’s Office works with the County Executive’s Office to receive and process claims filed against the County. Further investigation may indicate justification for payment by the County. If so, payment will be made under the authority of the Risk Manager or will be brought back to the Board for consideration.

 

DISCUSSION:

The County Attorney’s Office has reviewed these claims and recommends that the Board take the actions set forth below.  

 

Claim #

Claimant

Incident Date

Recommended Board Action and Basis

Claims recommended for denial:

 

 

G26-21195

Sook Ya Yoo

4/7/2026

Non-culpable

 

 

 

Claimant alleges the County is responsible for damages incurred

 

when she tripped and fell over uneven pavement in Redwood City.

 

 

G26-21258

Marcus Lopez

5/30/2026

Non-culpable

 

 

 

Claimant alleges the County is responsible for damages incurred 

 

by Claimant when a SamTrans bus made an abrupt stop.

 

 

A26-21112

State Farm for Kenneth L. Kettell

8/12/2026

Non-culpable

 

 

 

Claimant alleges the County is responsible for damages incurred

 

to his vehicle by a County vehicle in San Carlos.

 

 

M25-202512

Caroline Lee

10/6/2026

Non-culpable

 

 

 

Claimant alleges County is responsible for damages incurred by

 

Claimant when she was placed on a psychiatric hold.

 

 

FISCAL IMPACT:

None.